On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 13:27 +0000, Ian Dickinson wrote: > On 18/02/11 12:18, Dave Reynolds wrote: > > Does a consolidated suggestion like this work? > > > > +-- About > > +-- Download > > [Includes Maven] > > +-- Getting started > > [Small number of short guides.] > > +-- Tutorials > > [Would include topic tutorial (such as the existing RDF& SPARQL > > ones) as well as cross-cutting tutorials (such as Ian's working > > with Jena under Eclipse)] > > [I would also put the critical HOW TOs here (IO, Frames, > > Assembler) but they could be in a section under the detailed > > documentation] > > +-- Documentation > > +-- javadoc > > +-- RDF > > +-- Query > > +-- TDB > > +-- SDB > > +-- Serving data (Fuseki) > > +-- Ontology > > +-- Inference > > +-- tools > > +-- extras > > +-- Community > > [Should include roadmap, guidance on patch submission, links to > > trackers etc.] > > +-- News > > OK, I'm happy with this, modulo the change of names for the Fuseki and > Community sections, and dropping news. I have a minor quibble about > Documentation as a title - it seems slightly tautologous since the whole > site is documentation of one kind or another.
Agreed. I'd be happy with (or indeed prefer) "In Depth" or "API Documentation" or many other names. Should be easy to change though. > But I don't propose to > prolong the discussion, and we can always do some A/B testing once the > site is up :) (<-- nb for clarity: last bit's a joke) Oh but semantic gaze tracking (user spend 90% studying this topic, independent of site nav structure) would make a fine spin off project :) Dave
