On 24/10/11 09:42, Ian Dickinson wrote:
On 24/10/11 07:25, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Ian Dickinson (Commented) (JIRA) wrote:
Ian Dickinson commented on JENA-36:
-----------------------------------
We should probably remove the build.xml file. Any reason not to
do so?
Has there been a decision not to support builds other than using
Maven? I use Maven quite happily, but I realise that not all of the
rest of the world does! I would suggest that dropping non-Maven
builds - a decision which may affect some current Jena users -
should be at least ratified by a vote (unless there has already
been one and I've forgotten it)
Hi Ian, hi all, I don't know if there are good reasons to have an Ant
build.xml for Jena, if there are, please, share them with me and the
others.
I'm just pointing out that for something that has a direct effect on
existing end-users, we should ratify the decision by a vote rather than
make it by default. It would also give an opportunity for users who care
about keeping an ant build script to volunteer to maintain it.
Ian
Paolo/Dave/Ian,
Is someone going to call the vote then?! Or at least start a clearly
signalled discussion?
Andy
