Greetings,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]> wrote:
> * Yes it is the bad practice to put repos in POMs
> * Yes it many more developers/contributors friendly to add repo in POMs
> (as far as we don't add not controlled repos and our artifacts aren't
> supposed to be reused)
> * Yes it was a bad idea and more generally all this part of projects infra
> description, users/groups settings ....
>
It's only bad because the location might change. Since it is really just a
CNAME record, I don't think the root cause of why specifying
<{r,pluginR}epositories> applies.
+1 to coding our own <{r,pluginR}epositories> section for our CNAME record
+1 to coding a m-enforcer-p rule which fails builds for
additional <{r,pluginR}epositories>
> As I said to Nicolas & KK at the last hackergarten in Paris I drived a
> contribution for such mass change : https://gist.github.com/2305867 (by
> @jeanhelou)
> Nicolas might probably starts from it.
>
Please remember that there are close to 200 plugins which are in SVN still.
They would need to be migrated to GitHub before applying this kind of broad
and automatic conversion.
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Moving+from+Subversion+%28svn%29+to+Github
-Jesse
--
There are 10 types of people in this world, those
that can read binary and those that can not.
