Hi Jorg, LTS based on new Jenkins version is released in interval of roughly 3 months and it's rather collective decision made on Jenkins governance meetings (for detail see [1]).
As 1.447.1 was release by end of March, I would expect 1.4XY.1 by beginning of July. I put it on next meeting agenda [2] to choose baseline for new LTS. But as current LTS is based on 1.447, features added in 1.448 should be definitely present in new LTS, no matter what the new baseline will be. Cheers Vojta [1] https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/LTS+Release+Line [2] https://wiki.jenkins- ci.org/display/JENKINS/Governance+Meeting+Agenda#GovernanceMeetingAgenda- June27thMeeting On Thursday 14 June 2012 00:54:48 Jorg Heymans wrote: > Hi Vojta, > > At what point will LTS be based on a new Jenkins version ? I was hoping to > use the repository per executor feature that was added in 1.448, any idea > when this will get added to the LTS branch ? > > Thanks > Jorg Heymans > > On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 8:56:35 AM UTC+2, vjuranek wrote: > > Hi, > > once again sorry for LTS delay. > > I find following issues to be back ported to LTS 1.447.2: > > > > Blockers or critical issues: > > * JENKINS-8663 - Parsing of POM happens before SNAPSHOT-Parents are > > updated > > * JENKINS-12994 - Quiet period is blocking other jobs in queue > > * JENKINS-13129 - Updating built-in plugins doesn't work, the file doesn't > > get > > pinned and is overwritten on the next startup > > * JENKINS-13448 - Guice injector failure can cause failure of whole > > Jenkins > > > > Major issues (explicitly requested on dev list or IMHO possibly critical > > issues): > > * JENKINS-1152, JENKINS-3983 - Mail server rejecting emails from hudson, > > SMTP > > authentication not working > > * JENKINS-9882 - Jenkins runs out of file descriptors (winstone problem) > > * JENKINS-12674 - "Too many files open " causes Jenkins to stop responding > > * JENKINS-13238 - Loading All Build History Fails > > * JENKINS-13649 - Invalid environment variable values when running > > hierarchical jobs on windows slaves > > > > > > Any other proposals for back ports? > > > > Thanks > > Vojta
