I'm afraid that I'm not getting what you're trying to say.
My concern was that 1.590.4 would include JENKINS-19352 via JENKINS-15935.
In that case we would IMO have no other option than to revert
JENKINS-15935 in the LTS branch.
Luckily, I could disprove that JENKINS-19352 is in LTS.
But JENKINS-19396 is which is IMO minor.
So what are you saying? That we should revert JENKINS-15935?
Or include a fix for JENKINS-19352 - which doesn't exist, yet, ergo
doesn't fulfill the requirements to be included in the LTS?
cheers
Kutzi
Am 05.10.2013 14:11, schrieb domi:
But it should not really raise questions if would include it in the LTS…
In my opinion we should but this in - also when looking at the number
of Votes and Watchs on this issue, we should but it in….
Domi
On 05.10.2013, at 14:05, Christoph Kutzinski <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
prevent the LTS release.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins
Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
