Sonar is in my opinion evil esp when used with maven projects.  Maybe things 
gaffe changed on the post few years but anything that makes a build not 
reproducible gets left at the door

On 3 February 2015 19:33:12 GMT+00:00, Kanstantsin Shautsou 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Do you have comparison list why sonar is better? AFAIR sonar has
>unclear 
>old history while jenkins store exact to builds history.
>
>On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 2:39:55 PM UTC+3, Stephen Connolly
>wrote:
>>
>> Send too soon
>>
>> On Sunday, February 1, 2015, Stephen Connolly
><[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> Many years ago, I was working for a company and we were asked to
>report 
>>> on test coverage...
>>>
>>> So I wrote the clover plugin...
>>>
>>> Then we ha a new corporate standard pushed from on high, so I wrote
>the 
>>> Cobertura plugin 
>>>
>>> Then people started to complain when their 75mb coverage reports did
>not 
>>> work
>>>
>>> And corp wanted complete coverage including c++, .net, etc
>>>
>>> Then launched an effort to unify the three Java coverage plugins,
>that 
>> dragged me off writing maven plugins, and lots of other things
>>
>> Sonar is probably a better solution for this space but at some stage
>*if* 
>> I ever get time I will work on this again...
>>
>> It's an interesting and hard problem  
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Surya Gaddipati
><[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I saw the following statement on the wiki page for cobertura
>pluggin 
>>>>
>>>> "The current thinking is to merge this plugin into more generic 
>>>> coverage plugin. Help appreciated." 
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Cobertura+Plugin
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering how I can help with that effort.   I am interested
>in 
>>>> generic coverage plugin that would enable me to develop tools on
>top of 
>>>> it,. 
>>>>
>>>> Surya
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>
>https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/971fb21f-92d9-4436-aed4-2ce742a80d71%40googlegroups.com
>
>>>>
><https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/971fb21f-92d9-4436-aed4-2ce742a80d71%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>>>
>>>  
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Sent from my phone
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Sent from my phone
>>
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to [email protected].
>To view this discussion on the web visit
>https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/76ff2539-25e8-4b6d-af83-5aa2abb50b7d%40googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/C1F5B5E1-D570-46CC-AEED-4FB8207B117A%40teilo.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to