On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Kanstantsin Shautsou <[email protected]> wrote: >> Since dumb slaves have to be explicitly added, this would >> be silly. So even offering this retention strategy on a dumb slave >> would be very confusing to a user. > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/CuSe3RgX3Xo
I saw that. This is a specialized use case. Probably the nodepool should really be a Cloud. If it cannot be that, then there should be a specialized plugin for use with nodepool which created slaves with that strategy. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr16cf4GukjSfLF%2Bzm4wV8M9gLPe0vJyaqyF%3DSW4V%2BVbJg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
