If Daniel has no objections that i propose https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-26964
On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 11:32:45 PM UTC+3, Daniel Beck wrote: > > It would be great if you could consider JENKINS-27739 despite only being > in 1.617. It should be soaked enough just before the end of the backporting > window. > > On 08.06.2015, at 22:29, oliver gondža <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Backporting for next LTS release started. > > > > Candidates: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/issues/?filter=12146 > > Fixed: > https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%201.609.2-fixed > > > > -- > > oliver > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/op.xzxhvbqxsbfict%40arch. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/1f89f8a8-3429-46c5-9375-8fe127b35e5d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
