My ones are: JENKINS-28690 (fix merged to trunk) JENKINS-28840 (expect a fix tomorrow) JENKINS-28844 (pull request under review)
Of these 28690 and 28840 I view as critical to pick up in 1.609.2 whereas 28844 is a really really really nice to have (pretty please with catnip) I suspect that we may have to wait with 28844 until the end of the backporting window, but I want to flag it as early as possible On 10 June 2015 at 18:37, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I have three issues that should go in despite not meeting the > standard criteria. In two cases the change is small, low risk and I have > analysed the change for impact. > > The third is a remoting change I am currently working to get merged... > I'd like if it can be included butay be able to have it wait for .3 > > > On Monday, June 8, 2015, oliver gondža <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Backporting for next LTS release started. >> >> Candidates: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/issues/?filter=12146 >> Fixed: >> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%201.609.2-fixed >> >> -- >> oliver >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Jenkins Developers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/op.xzxhvbqxsbfict%40arch. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > -- > Sent from my phone > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CA%2BnPnMyo690%2BbFCACLF9nB_DchCCuV%2BVMD1xv1cWf%2BkhgNFmjQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
