My ones are: JENKINS-28690 (fix merged to trunk) JENKINS-28840 (expect a fix tomorrow) JENKINS-28844 (pull request under review)
Of these 28690 and 28840 I view as critical to pick up in 1.609.2 whereas 28844 is a really really really nice to have (pretty please with catnip) I suspect that we may have to wait with 28844 until the end of the backporting window, but I want to flag it as early as possible On 10 June 2015 at 18:37, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think I have three issues that should go in despite not meeting the > standard criteria. In two cases the change is small, low risk and I have > analysed the change for impact. > > The third is a remoting change I am currently working to get merged... > I'd like if it can be included butay be able to have it wait for .3 > > > On Monday, June 8, 2015, oliver gondža <ogon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Backporting for next LTS release started. >> >> Candidates: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/issues/?filter=12146 >> Fixed: >> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%201.609.2-fixed >> >> -- >> oliver >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Jenkins Developers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/op.xzxhvbqxsbfict%40arch. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > -- > Sent from my phone > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CA%2BnPnMyo690%2BbFCACLF9nB_DchCCuV%2BVMD1xv1cWf%2BkhgNFmjQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
