On 16.06.2015, at 22:31, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is a real shame for 28690 and 28840. > > I think it is a greater risk not merging those two than merging them, but I > understand your position. > > I suspect this may mean a sizeable cohort of users who just cannot upgrade to > the 1.609 LTS until .3 but so be it. Oliver, it looks like there's still no RC for 1.609.2 (I'll try to poke KK again later today). Since it's been a few weeks, the fixes for the issues requested by Stephen have now been released. Both JENKINS-28690 and JENKINS-28840 were in 1.618, which is still a little too recent, but they appear to also fix the quite popular JENKINS-28513. Not getting them in will make the next LTS useless for quite a number of users. Could you take another look at these fixes and reconsider them for 1.609.2? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/BB1ED5EC-58B8-4CE0-ABD5-B2DDE9D10020%40beckweb.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
