On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:18 AM, martinda <[email protected]> wrote: > I have 141 projects, > 30,373 builds, and 1,073,591 junit XML test results. It took me over 20 > minutes of CPU time to get these values by querying the file system.
Yes, build storage is a well-known architectural problem. PR 1641 will not help you here. > Will Jenkins 2.0 have database backend? No, the changes required are too big. There is no way to do it that quickly. I think we *should* do these changes sooner or later. For me this seems both more important and more disruptive than the code changes currently being discussed for 2.0. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr1VbCeLQh8nO1jVOqYuBqZptCWNehtw59_FU19AuKEs7g%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
