On Tuesday 24 November 2015 20:20:11 Richard Bywater wrote: > In terms of visibility, I wonder if any thought has been given of > publishing the type of licence in the Plugin Info box on the wiki?
+1, it definitely doesn't hurt, but I would one step further and provide this information also in update center. Probably split it into two parts, free plugins and non-free plugins (similar to e.g. rpmfusion.org, where packages with "no commercial use"-like restrictions are in non-free repository), to make it very visible to users, that if they want to use any of non-free plugins, they should check licenses really carefully. In the past I was about to use Highcharts in on of my plugins, but finally decided not to use it, as I was afraid it could result into massive (unintentional) violation of the license by end users. Vojta -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/2474227.LEXmc16s5B%40dhcp-10-40-5-80.brq.redhat.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
