This sounds like a solid first pass to me, worth trying out for a month or
so to see how it goes.

I'm also interested in helping, so put me on the list!
On Jan 19, 2017 9:34 AM, "Slide" <[email protected]> wrote:

> There was a discussion in the Governance Meeting yesterday [1] about
> creating a Bug Triage "Team." The goal of this team would be to triage
> issues on [2] to make sure that they are assigned to the correct component,
> assigned to the correct developer and are actually still valid. The reason
> the idea of an official "Team" was put forward would be so that those
> people would have the ok to touch issues across the board. There are some
> people that do this already (Daniel Beck and a few others) who most people
> know, so they have some credibility already, some of the volunteers for
> this may not, so we thought being part of the team would allow users have
> more credibility if they are less well known to the community.
>
> We discussed in the meeting that we should focus on a couple of key areas
>
> 1) issues assigned to the core component with no assignee
> 2) issues assigned to plugins that are part of the "recommended" set of
> plugins for the new install wizard
> 3) issues that are not assigned to anything or anyone in particular
>
> The outcome of a triage on a specific issue would be that the correct
> component(s) and assignee were there. In addition, if possible a test to
> see how reproducible the issue is. If an issue has languished for some time
> and is using very old versions of Jenkins/plugin/etc, we would close the
> issue (it could still be reopened if someone is still seeing the issue).
>
> I'd like to get some feedback on this proposal:
>
> 1) Do we have the correct scope planned out?
> 2) Is more detail needed?
> 3) Anything else you want to ask/propose?
>
> If you want to participate in the team, please let me know and I'll start
> collecting a list of people. Please note, you don't need to be a developer
> to help here, if you can create a Jenkins instance and try and reproduce
> issues, that is great too, or even just getting the component(s) and
> assignees in place would be very helpful.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex Earl
>
>
> 1 - http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins-meeting/2017/
> jenkins-meeting.2017-01-18-18.01.html
> 2 - https://issues.jenkins-ci.org
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPiUgVfuKH8SyZdg_MPDi963hLy-
> HAAjfWS8HSYw3zdHLk7FNw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPiUgVfuKH8SyZdg_MPDi963hLy-HAAjfWS8HSYw3zdHLk7FNw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAHtcACFfDqbu7xPEjVK3wyGEJAut3wwg8c7Mwe8%2Bk85Cwz10Mw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to