Oleg,

Standardization is key principle in this kind of projects ;)

Daniel,

I agree with you. I did not remember that this version format was supported
by https://github.com/jenkinsci/lib-version-number

Thank you for your feedback.


2017-07-02 21:05 GMT+02:00 Daniel Beck <[email protected]>:

>
> > On 2. Jul 2017, at 19:05, Manuel Jesús Recena Soto <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > IMHO, It would be easier to release this wrapper plugin following the
> most used format, instead of applying more hacks in the PCT.
>
> The "hack" being a library upgrade to a version not several years out of
> date?
>
> https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-compat-tester/pull/32 does not look
> like a hack to me...
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/jenkinsci-dev/F947A69A-5843-4F01-AAAA-C6F03810C6F6%40beckweb.net.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Manuel Recena Soto
* manuelrecena.com [/blog]
* linkedin.com/in/recena

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CABa-UofjSs7uAF3kB1dhoFiSLSezwnHhduQh1j4XOC-fBcXV%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to