Hi,

I am not against removing CLI over Remoting. Or maybe it makes sense to 
move it to a plugin (without adding it as a detached plugin). But I do not 
quite get the need to simplify the component structure. It is just a matter 
of time till we hit another Java-specific test classes & Co. E.g. we may 
need to create Java11-only tests, or to add tests relying on modules 
detached from Java 11. I prefer to keep the code ready to such 
requirements, so revering test-parent would be a step backward IMO

BR, Oleg





On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 4:58:09 PM UTC+1, Mark Waite wrote:
>
> +1 from me as well.
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 3:21 PM Jeff Thompson <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I support this proposal. We’ve seen another case recently of a problem 
>> with this antiquated mode. We have had to adjust tests to continue 
>> supporting it.
>>
>> I don’t think there is enough value in continuing to support it, 
>> particularly with the costs to keep coaxing it along.
>>
>> Jeff Thompson
>>
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 2:42 PM, Jesse Glick <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>> As of JENKINS-41745, merged in Jenkins 2.54 more than a year and a
>> half ago, the Remoting transport for the Jenkins CLI has been
>> deprecated as inherently hard to secure and just plain unwise. As far
>> as I know, all important CLI commands have long since removed any
>> dependency on this mode, or offered an alternative mode. The UI warns
>> you if you enable it. Is it time to finally remove this code?
>>
>> I bring this up now because of Java 11 work:
>>
>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/3759
>>
>> made the physical layout of Jenkins core more complex, just in order
>> to maintain some exploit tests which were really only interesting in
>> CLI over Remoting, and not even that interesting anyway after JEP-200.
>> (Deserialization attacks via agents could still be launched, but
>> again, that would be much harder after JEP-200.)
>>
>> I propose this `jenkins-test-jdk8` module and its three test suites
>> and ysoserial library be deleted, whether or not CLI over Remoting is
>> also removed, so that we can remove `jenkins-test-parent` and go back
>> to having only `jenkins-test`.
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr3RN-dRrPFXW%2Bn1S9V8VXDPRqxQL02t0NHcVyqwEq1n3g%40mail.gmail.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/78DB206D-FBA7-4F95-8AE8-AFC5280800CF%40cloudbees.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/78DB206D-FBA7-4F95-8AE8-AFC5280800CF%40cloudbees.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Thanks!
> Mark Waite
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/28e65655-9fa5-4e51-894a-a45bce6f5a71%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to