On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 7:43 AM Daniel Beck <m...@beckweb.net> wrote: > None of these would apply in all cases.
True, but I think the commonality would be that someone who is committed to pushing it forward would not be starting from scratch. The lack of interested reviewers is often due to the original PR being too hard to review, whether because it had too many small issues that were not getting cleaned up proactively, or was making a dangerous change with inadequate testing or kill switches, etc. At any rate, if both Oliver and Daniel are skeptical about the need then it would be better to withdraw the suggestion. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr20DAKPMRZJak7Mk-Zb1qHnz0Xcb%3D2hLcOAbH-7FvXoGg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
