Irwin,
Thanks for the links! One of those issue is one I opened up! Like I mentioned to Mark, I spoke with the Adopt team and the additional support of more base images are coming in the next PR. The testing framework needs to be updated first to support the additional bases. On Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 4:30:20 PM UTC-4, Irwin D'Souza wrote: > > I mentioned this thread on the AdoptOpenJDK slack instance; it looks like > there's been talks around increased Docker base image coverage: > https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-docker/issues/236 & > https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-tests/issues/1109 > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 1:47 PM Mark Waite <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Yes, issues with musl vs. glibc were the key reason that I had heard for >> OpenJDK to not be willing to support Java 11 on Alpine. >> >> I don't see any mention of Alpine or Debian on the official images page >> at https://hub.docker.com/_/adoptopenjdk . There is mention of Alpine >> and Debian on the unofficial images page at >> https://hub.docker.com/r/adoptopenjdk/openjdk8 . Is there somewhere >> that the difference between official and unofficial AdoptOpenJDK images is >> described? >> >> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 7:30 AM Jim Crowley <[email protected] >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> >>> Mark, >>> >>> For Alpine are you referring to the issue with glibc vs musl? It looks >>> like the AdoptOpenJDK team built Alpine images with glibc install on top of >>> the base image. You can look at the Dockefile here, >>> https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-docker/tree/master/8/jdk/alpine >>> . >>> >>> I am loving the AdoptOpenJDK team's support for multiple platforms too! >>> I think it is also nice having all the OpenJ9 builds as well as Hotspot. >>> Give users more choice is a good thing! I am really hoping for an arm port >>> of OpenJ9 down the line! >>> >>> Let me know if you have any more questions! >>> >>> On Friday, October 18, 2019 at 6:54:08 PM UTC-4, Mark Waite wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks very much for starting the discussion. >>>> >>>> I'm interested in evaluating the switch from OpenJDK to AdoptOpenJDK. >>>> I've been using JDK 8 and 11 hotspot builds from AdoptOpenJDK for many >>>> months with very good results. >>>> >>>> Several of the OpenJDK providers (Red Hat, Amazon, Azul) seem to be >>>> limiting their platform support much more than AdoptOpenJDK does. So long >>>> as we can get the platforms we need (Debian, CentOS, UBI), I'm interested >>>> in evaluating the change. >>>> >>>> I thought there were specific barriers that prevent Alpine Linux >>>> support, though I see that Azul provides an Alpine Linux build for 8, 11, >>>> and 13. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 2:09 PM Jim Crowley <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I posted this proposal on GitHub, >>>>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/issues/893, but also wanted to >>>>> get the feedback of the community here. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As we start to look into supporting multiple architectures, we might >>>>> want to pivot from using OpenJDK to AdoptOpenJDK. There are couple >>>>> reasons >>>>> behind this. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> First, it makes our build scripts and Dockerfiles easier to maintain. >>>>> Currently, in publish-experimental.sh, we have logic that handles pulling >>>>> from the “right” OpenJDK for a specific architecture. This could be >>>>> remove >>>>> as the AdoptOpenJDK Docker image, >>>>> https://hub.docker.com/_/adoptopenjdk, has a manifest file that will >>>>> handle pulling the correct image for the given architecture. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Second, the OpenJDK image’s we are pulling from to build out our >>>>> multi-arch images, s390x/ openjdk:8-jdk, arm32v7/openjdk:8-jdk, etc. will >>>>> not be updated anymore. This has to do with OpenJDK not publishing >>>>> “official” binaries for these architectures. More information on this >>>>> issue >>>>> can be found here, >>>>> https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/issues/364#issuecomment-540821603 >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Third, this would pair nicely with the proposal to add OpenJ9, >>>>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/issues/884. The AdoptOpenJDK >>>>> image has tags that support OpenJ9, so it should not be to much more work >>>>> to support this additional tag for our Jenkins images. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The only roadblock right now is the base image/tag support the >>>>> official AdoptOpenJDK image on DockerHub. Currently, they only support an >>>>> Ubuntu and Widows Server Core base image. I talked with the Adopt team, >>>>> Alpine and Debian, Ubi base images are coming down the pipeline. This is >>>>> aimed at the next PR to the official DockerHub image repository. >>>>> CentOS/ClefOS are also coming but I do not have an ETA. >>>>> >>>>> Now we could wait for the official image or we could use the >>>>> unofficial images the Adopt team does produce. Using the unofficial >>>>> images >>>>> does provide us with Alpine, Debian, etc support quicker. But they will >>>>> be >>>>> unofficial images, which I know some users do not like to use. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Either way, I wanted to get community feedback! So please let me know >>>>> what you think of this proposal. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/6eb646a8-6835-4720-beca-9afe95fa0ca0%40googlegroups.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/6eb646a8-6835-4720-beca-9afe95fa0ca0%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks! >>>> Mark Waite >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c159ed57-6990-4a66-9756-38517e6800f3%40googlegroups.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c159ed57-6990-4a66-9756-38517e6800f3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks! >> Mark Waite >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Jenkins Developers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAO49JtGCZ4Spq3H3gRis3EvWJNZqfFUqOwU%3Dkhexhr%2BYmNjX4g%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAO49JtGCZ4Spq3H3gRis3EvWJNZqfFUqOwU%3Dkhexhr%2BYmNjX4g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/4c6fe5e0-6b57-463a-839b-4f7b1fd8246b%40googlegroups.com.
