+1 for the 3.x as a statement of intentions to the end users and +1 for the 
time-based release versioning.


On Friday, 27 November 2020 at 12:03:21 UTC [email protected] wrote:

> I wouldn't object to bumping the version to a major (3.x). There are 
> enough changes, even if they are not that impressive to average users. That 
> said, I have some questions.
>
>    - How could we do it? We cannot ignore the fact that we are 5 weeklies 
>    in after the changes have been merged.
>    - If we go for 3.x, should we also change the versioning scheme? Can 
>    this come later? I think any discussions regarding versioning schemes 
>    should go together with a proper deprecation & removal policy. We could 
> use 
>    this chance, for example, to say "we're removing prototypejs in 2 years, 
> by 
>    version X". That's why I think it may be a bit out of scope for this 
>    discussion (IMO).
>
>
> On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 12:26:49 PM UTC+1 [email protected] 
> wrote:
>
>> > 
>> > I like the idea of the very clear dated releases. It makes support a 
>> lot easier eg. "Oh your release was from november of last year, you should 
>> upgrade" "okay, your using 2.65, when did that get released? oh 2 years 
>> ago?" Like I never have to think when Ubuntu 20.04 came out, I know it was 
>> more or less april of this year. The tricky thing is how would dates work 
>> with LTS releases. It would be odd to have Jenkins 20201114-3 being 
>> released in early 2021.
>> > 
>>
>> I think a scheme similar as used for IntelliJ would work as well for us, 
>> we can use weeks rather then milestones: year.week.patchlevel
>> I would not recommend to use the exact dates in the version as this is 
>> harder to correctly write in bug reports.
>>
>> So 2020.30, 2020.31, and so on for the weekly releases, and 2020.30.1, 
>> 2020.30.2, and so on for LTS release. 
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/341c82d4-1d1b-4886-a1c3-7e3b7ffa0c7an%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to