I think we can switch the baseline to newer? Either way I think it's fine to include the above change.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 08:00, Basil Crow <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 11:28 PM Daniel Beck <[email protected]> wrote: > > Core dependency version number semantics means anyone on a weekly > release after the LTS baseline but before the change made it into core > regularly, will not have that API and plugins will fail while appearing > compatible. > > Ah right, I hadn't considered that. > > > Given that only dependency updates went into 2.303, there's also an > argument for us to choose that as the new baseline instead of 2.302; > eliminating the above problem entirely without adding a lot of risk through > unproven changes (I would expect commons-compress and spring-security > updates to be safe enough). > > If it isn't too late to switch to 2.303, that sounds ideal to me. I > can easily update the BOM line. But I don't feel strongly either way. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFwNDjoS1MQP3LzjcXDkETPc9MjoMv10yd6ZLKcPekZsawNcDA%40mail.gmail.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BidRD5GC1cv%2BPzkcZJ%3DSVwxf93%2B%2B7_ckGWRCQb12y-K2_A%40mail.gmail.com.
