I think David Whitten wrote:
> > But this would break ALL Java code that works with Jess. Should I
> > compromise and put dozens of forwarding methods in Rete like
>
> Could you explain (on the mailing list?) why this would break ALL
> Java Code ? Is it because you won't support the old interfaces,
> or because the new inteface won't know how to deal with the data ?
>
Right now virtually everyone who writes Java code with Jess does
something like
Rete r = new Rete();
...
r.reset();
r.run();
What I'm proposing is that they'd have to do something like:
r.getAgenda().reset();
r.getAgenda().run();
Alternatively, Rete could still have a run() method, but this would
keep the class just as messy as it is now, and that's what I'd like to
fix.
---------------------------------------------------------
Ernest Friedman-Hill
Distributed Systems Research Phone: (925) 294-2154
Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234
Org. 8920, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PO Box 969 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov
Livermore, CA 94550
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
