At 13:47 07.05.01 -0400, Graham Heyes wrote:
>Hello Folks
> I dropped off the jess list for a while so I'm sorry if this topic
>has been beaten to death already. I couldn't find much in the archives
>though.
> I would like to use Jess in a real-time control system to monitor
>parameters from physical devices like power supplies, pumps, magnets
>etc. I have writen a few clip files as part of a pilot project to test
>the fesability. I was showing the clip to someone and their comment was
>"I hope you don't expect our users to learn this!". It's a valid point.
>I think I understand clip/Jess but the language itself is rather
>cryptic. Is there any "natural language" method out there which would
>allow us to write rules and facts in a way which a non-expert can
>understand. I could probably get someone in my group to work on it but,
>obviously, would rather start with something which already exists.
> Regards,
>
> Graham
Graham,
You can do this if you solve a little problem first: Find a way to
automatically defer meaning from non-standardized human language. But since
researchers from all over the globe have unsuccessfully tried to solve this
little problem for the last 3 millenia, hopes are dim that you will be able
to come up with a quick fix.
;) Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
