I agree with the general idea of completing 1.3 and starting a 2.0 based on a new API.
Paul Spencer Santiago Gala wrote: > Setera, Craig wrote: > >> I took a look at the new portal API specification. It looks >> excellent. I >> like the parallels being drawn between the portlet API and the >> servlets API. >> When is the plan to decide on this proposal and begin implementation? >> Soon >> after 1.3a2? >> > The idea after we have stabilized 1.3a2, we could proceed in two > separate lines: > - Go for a 1.3 that is basically as 1.3a2 with bugs removed, better > security, ... > - Go for a 2.0 that would use the new portal API specification. For this > work I would like to have feedback from the IBM team involved in > Websphere portal server, since they were the original authors (after > list discussion and feedback) of the proposal. > > The better features in the new Portlet API proposal: > - Pure XML portal framework becomes possible, with end-to-end SAX event > streams, instead of memory objects or character streams > - Better parameter isolation between portlets > - More independent from base frameworks > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
