On 12/11/01 8:58 AM, "Paul Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with the general idea of completing 1.3 and starting a 2.0 based > on a new API. Possibly based on Turbine 3.x? :-) > Paul Spencer > > Santiago Gala wrote: > >> Setera, Craig wrote: >> >>> I took a look at the new portal API specification. It looks >>> excellent. I >>> like the parallels being drawn between the portlet API and the >>> servlets API. >>> When is the plan to decide on this proposal and begin implementation? >>> Soon >>> after 1.3a2? >>> >> The idea after we have stabilized 1.3a2, we could proceed in two >> separate lines: >> - Go for a 1.3 that is basically as 1.3a2 with bugs removed, better >> security, ... >> - Go for a 2.0 that would use the new portal API specification. For this >> work I would like to have feedback from the IBM team involved in >> Websphere portal server, since they were the original authors (after >> list discussion and feedback) of the proposal. >> >> The better features in the new Portlet API proposal: >> - Pure XML portal framework becomes possible, with end-to-end SAX event >> streams, instead of memory objects or character streams >> - Better parameter isolation between portlets >> - More independent from base frameworks >> >> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
