* Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | > they don't want to venture into. If that is so, and he is unable to qualify | > other solutions then a jsp solution is better. | | Beyond the obvious...JSP has had quite a few published essays on why it is a | piece of crap technology. Including one that was the cover story of the Java | Developers Journal. I have also informally interviewed many other people who | have had to work with JSP and all of them agree that it sucks. | | How many essays or discussions with people have you found showing any real | weakness in Velocity? So far, I haven't found any and I have been looking. | Pointing me in the right direction is appreciated.
I don't think you understand what I said. I don't say that you and I can't qualify other solutions, but if this guy cannot qualify why it makes more sense to use Velocity than JSP for a given project then his management will choose JSP. If you don't know why you change, then why bother changing ? It's a bit the same for other server technology, we all know Linux is more stable than Windows, we all know PostgreSQL is a more robust and faster database solution than MySQL, etc. But people still use the latter technology ? Why ? Because they like to continue using what they already know, and in some cases that is fine, it really depends on the scope of the project. -- Gunnar R�nning - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
