David, Although I think the is the best way to proceed, I have a few questions:
David Sean Taylor wrote: > Hi All, > > With the coming of the new year, I am looking forward to moving on to > Jetspeed-2. > > The first subject to discuss is whether the Jetspeed developers would like > to support the Portlet API standards effort, and participate in the JCP > expert group. > > I'd like to then call for a vote on: > > (1) Does the Jetspeed Community support the Portlet API Standard being > defined in the Java Community Process (so that it will be standardized in > the context of J2EE) This implies that we will base Jetspeed-2 on the new > proposed standard. > o How long is the standards process? I agree we should be standards based, I would not want to wait 5 years for the standard to be released. > (2) If yes, does the Jetspeed Community want to participate by sending > Jetspeed Developer(s) to the Portlet API JSR Expert Group ? > o What does "participate by sending Jetspeed Developer(s) to the Portlet API Expert Group" involve? > > The JSR is yet to appear at jcp.org. > I've included below Thomas's description (again) of the Portlet API > specification, which contains much of the same text as sent to the JCP. > > David > Paul Spencer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
