Glenn, I will work on this patch tonight. Paul Spencer
Glenn Golden wrote: > "forPortlet()" was introduced recently, in: > > revision 1.6 > date: 2002/03/05 12:26:33; author: sgala > > I propose we change it, since there has not been enough time for this to > become a widely used feature. > > - Glenn > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Paul Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:58 AM >>To: Jetspeed Developers List >>Subject: Re: [PATCH] proposed for peid >> >> >>Glenn >> >>Glenn Golden wrote: >> >> >>>David - >>> >>> >><snip> >> >>>I still want a change in the JetspeedTemplateLink's >>> >>"forPortlet", so >> >>>that it >>>a) takes a peid not a name, and b) if given blank or null, >>> >>just ignores the >> >>>call. My changes for this are in the patch as well. >>> >> >> >>I applied and tested the patch locally. Although it worked as you >>described, I did not commit it because it changes a parameter >>passed to >>the existing method forPortlet() from Name to PEID. Their are sites >>using Jetspeed and we need to maintain backward compatibility >>whenever >>practical. I have be working with David on the best way to >>resolve the >>root problem(s). >> >> >>>Can you review and apply these patches? Thanks! >>> >> > >> > >> >>>- Glenn >>> >> >> >>Paul Spencer >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >><mailto:jetspeed-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For >>additional commands, >>e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
