> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn Golden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:56 PM
> To: 'Jetspeed Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] proposed for peid
>
>
> I think I figured out what the $jlink. call should be to add
> the peid parts to the URL, instead of setPortlet() or forPortlet()...
>
> If we use the model of addQueryData() and addPathInfo(), why not:
>
> addPortalElement(peid)
+1
>
> addPortalElement can decide to do it as a query or a path,
> and what "js_peid" is might be called... I'd like to hide the
> "js_peid" from the templates.
>
> I'd like to also change the run data's setJs_peid and
> getJs_peid() to names that hide this "js_peid" a bit better, such as:
>
> getPortalElement()
> setPortalElement()
+1
>
> Then you could code a link such as:
>
> $jlink.addPortalElement($data.PortalElement)
>
> Comments?
>
> - Glenn
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Glenn R. Golden, Systems Research Programmer
> University of Michigan School of Information
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 734-615-1419
> http://www-personal.si.umich.edu/~ggolden/
> --------------------------------------------
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:jetspeed-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For
> additional commands,
> e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
