Hi Christiaan, What about the JetspeedSecurity and TurbineSecurity classes (DBSecurityService, DBUserManager)? In your port, did you make use of the Fulcrum classes?
David > -----Original Message----- > From: ckl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Subject: Re: jetspeed -> turbine3 script > > > >Sounds good. How well does Jetspeed work with Turbine-3 - any known > >problems/limitations? > > no real problems, just a lot of work, but also (on my w2k > machine) no real speed improvements but still, turbine 3 is > not optimized yet either ... > > >A frequent problem we get is sync'ing turbine-2 and torque - do you > >know if turbine-3 is any better with this - in particular, is > >TurbineUser a proper Torque generated object now? > > that was also for me one of the problems, it is better with > turbine3, you have to regenerate all om sources ofcource with > the decoupled torque. But I must say that I plan to use > objectbridge for the security classes > > >> There is a lot of jetspeed code that can benefit from the new > >> turbine3features. > > Such as? > > for example the templatelocaterservice could be rewritten as > Jason also suggested, this can be put in the pipeline. > > > > Christiaan ten Klooster > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
