Hi Christiaan, Im not ready to drop Torque yet. I would like to see Torque generated objects connecting to an ObjectBridge backend. I believe Martin was working on it. Not sure what the status is there. In the long run JDO + ObjectBridge would be a possibility.
> Have you already implemented a new security system with > objectbridge? Or are you using this new service for storing > the "org.apache.jetspeed.om.registry.base." > If not I would be very interested, even if it still very beta (alpha?) No, I haven't implemented security with ObjectBridge. Started writing a Registry service on top of ObjectBridge. Its not yet completed. Im writing a proposal for a new Jetspeed security system based on JAAS. But first I'd like to meet the immediate needs of getting Jetspeed converting to Turbine-3. In doing so, it would be best to keep the old security model provided by Fulcrum. Anyway, Im +1 on converting over to Turbine-3 immediately. I've starting working on it, and will report back my findings, then we can all decide if its worthwhile. Christiaan, thanks for getting this rolling, I still may need your help, David > -----Original Message----- > From: ckl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:50 AM > To: Jetspeed Developers List > Subject: Re: Subject: Re: jetspeed -> turbine3 script > > > Hi David, > > Yes I used the fulcrum classes, but now have modified them > for my own needs. I have build something like a virtualhost > mechanisme where the same db-schema is used in multiple > databases in one webapp. I did this by extending the > JetspeedRunData and adding a "vhost" attribute. > > It was hard but it works, however I want to use objectbridge > for this now. Maybe it is a good idea to drop torque when > moving to turbine3. I'm sure most ETC people want this after > seeing the presentation of objectbridge from Thomas Mahler. > > Have you already implemented a new security system with > objectbridge? Or are you using this new service for storing > the "org.apache.jetspeed.om.registry.base." > If not I would be very interested, even if it still very beta (alpha?) > > Anyway I would be happy to help in migrating to t3. > > thanx, > Christiaan > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Sean Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Jetspeed Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:30 PM > Subject: RE: Subject: Re: jetspeed -> turbine3 script > > > > Hi Christiaan, > > > > What about the JetspeedSecurity and TurbineSecurity classes > > (DBSecurityService, DBUserManager)? In your port, did you > make use of > > the Fulcrum classes? > > > > David > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ckl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:56 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Subject: Re: jetspeed -> turbine3 script > > > > > > > > > >Sounds good. How well does Jetspeed work with Turbine-3 - any > > > >known problems/limitations? > > > > > > no real problems, just a lot of work, but also (on my w2k > > > machine) no real speed improvements but still, turbine 3 is not > > > optimized yet either ... > > > > > > >A frequent problem we get is sync'ing turbine-2 and > torque - do you > > > >know if turbine-3 is any better with this - in particular, is > > > >TurbineUser a proper Torque generated object now? > > > > > > that was also for me one of the problems, it is better with > > > turbine3, you have to regenerate all om sources ofcource with the > > > decoupled torque. But I must say that I plan to use > objectbridge for > > > the security classes > > > > > > >> There is a lot of jetspeed code that can benefit from the new > > > >> turbine3features. > > > > Such as? > > > > > > for example the templatelocaterservice could be rewritten > as Jason > > > also suggested, this can be put in the pipeline. > > > > > > > > > > > > Christiaan ten Klooster > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:jetspeed-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
