My vote is +1 on using OJB over Torque in the next version, but I believe we shouldn't make this change in 1.4 since it may break a lot of applications based on 1.4.
I started writing a Registry service a while back with OJB, its in the cvs with ojb-0.7.343.jar Have you considered JDO + OJB? > -----Original Message----- > From: Weaver, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 01 October 2002 14:03 > To: 'Jetspeed Developers List' > Subject: OJB based security service, any thoughts? > > > Has anyone entertained the idea of using OJB as an > alternative to Torque as the underlying OM framework for the > Jetspeed Security Framework? I have one production > application and about 4 portlets using OJB 0.9.5 and am quite > happy with it. I would be more than happy work on it, time > and schedule permitting. > > Any thoughts? > > Scott > BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
