RE: OJB based security service, any thoughts?

[Matthew Baird]

fwiw I can help with any specific OJB questions. I would recommend getting the lastest 
0.9.6 release to build upon.
 
cheers,
Matthew

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Weaver, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
        Sent: Wed 10/2/2002 7:46 AM 
        To: 'Jetspeed Developers List' 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: OJB based security service, any thoughts?
        
        

        David,
        
        I just started looking at the security stuff in depth.  Right now I'm just 
starting to look PortalAuthentication.  The thing I immediately noticed is how generic 
the code in TurbineAuthentication.  In fact, I think the logic could be moved to a 
BaseAuthentication class were others could benefit from extending it into custom 
classes.  I have basically copied the whole thing verbatim into my OJBAuthentication 
class.
        
        Any thoughts?
        
        Scott 
        
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        > Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:17 AM
        > To: 'Jetspeed Developers List'
        > Subject: RE: OJB based security service, any thoughts?
        >
        >
        >
        > > Do you mean breaking user-apps based on Jetspeed or the
        > > actual base Jetspeed itself?  I thought the abstraction
        > > through the new security implementation prevented just this
        > > type of situation.
        > >
        > > Could we offer the option of an OJB-based impl. along side
        > > the Torque one?  Maybe, get people used to the OJB stuff
        > > early-on by choice and not by force.  We could also add an
        > > ant task to build a .war with OJB support and leave the
        > > default war option to Torque.
        >
        > Sorry, I misunderstood.
        > +1 on an optional OJB object model.
        > That would give people a chance to compare OJB with Torque.
        >
        >
        > BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/
        >
        > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
        > personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically
        > stated.
        > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do
        > not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
        > reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the
        > BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will
        > signify your consent to this.
        >
        >
        > --
        > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:jetspeed-dev-
        > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:jetspeed-dev-
        > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        

<<winmail.dat>>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>