> -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Hone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] allow xreg to be loaded from subdirectory > > > Hi all - > > Without knowing the coding requirements of this, here's my two cents: It > seems like combining xreg files distributed locally is something > natural to > XML. My practical experience is that I write a lot of portlet > definitions > in xreg, and it is hard to comb through the one > local-portlets.xreg file to > find the one I am working on at any given time. This even while > I think the > focus should stay on writing portlets that can be extended, by providing > useful base portlets that can have their properties altered to create new > portlet instances without new portlet registries. Something that can > operate like a channel or config file whose entries are places to > look for > xreg files (filenames with local/absolute URIs/URLs) would probably be > useful. > Im -0 on this proposal. I prefer to concentrate on other things and I have no need for subdirectories of registry entries. I usually end up with several portlet registry files per deployment, so its never been a issue for me.
A while back I tried to write a registry service using OJB. You're welcome to continue development on that one if you'd like In future releases, I think registries such focus on the new standards in this area, such as WSRP, UDDI, WSDL -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
