How about portletforge.net ;) *===================================* * Scott T Weaver������������������� * * Jakarta Jetspeed Portal Project�� * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * *===================================* �
> -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Huber2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:46 AM > To: Jetspeed Developers List > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Contributed portlets page > > > Well is it just me or is "Portlet Catalog" not the first term that comes > to > mind when thinking about a portlet repository ? Anyway, is this should be > an Apache-supported effort I think it should be anyway under an > *.apache.org domain, such as portlets.apache.org or something like that. > > If it's just a reference to an external repository, other alternatives are > available such as > > portlets.sourceforge.net (was at the time of this writing :)) > javaportlets.sourceforge.net > > etc... And in your proposal, what would happen when the 9 year lease ends > ? > You pull the plug ? The foundation gets a bill ? I perfectly understand > the > commercial proposition here, I'm just not sure if it's the foundation's > policy to get involved in such arrangements, and looking back it doesn't > seem like they have done so very often. > > Regards, > Serge Huber. > > At 00:10 27.07.2003 -0400, you wrote: > >I've got these domain names: > > portlet-catalog.org > > portlet-catalogue.org > > portletcatalog.com > > portletcatalog.net > > portletcatalog.org > > portletcatalogue.org > > theportletcatalog.com > > theportletcatalog.net > > theportletcatalog.org > > theportletcatalogue.org > > > >I had reservations about mentioning them on the jetspeed-list since I had > >plans to sell advertising on the site(s). > >My idea for the site(s) was: > > 1) Searchable catalog of portlets - vendor neutral (Sun, IBM, Oracle, > >Jetspeed, etc) > > 2) Articles about portlet development > > 3) Listings of java portal containers... eventually only JSR-168 > >compatible ones. > > > >My hope was to keep the site running based on advertising from commercial > >portlet providers. > >I was thinking of allowing free posting for free portlets, and charging a > >fee for portlets that > >are not free. Also allowing for rating of portlets, etc. > >Something a`la: Macromedia's tag gallery or rather Exchanges as they are > now > >called. > >http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/exchange/index.cfm#loc=en_us&view=sn100 > &vi > >ewName=Exchange > > > >I don't want upset people who will be offended by the commercial > >aspect/aspirations here, > >perhaps there is a compromise where I could agree to allow jetspeed > usuage > >of the > >*.org domain names above in such a way that I can still persue my ideas > with > >the other domains? > >Perhaps it could be the same site(s) except the .org version is not > >commercialized. > >I would also want to be able to keep the .org and the not .org sites > >roughly the same > >look-and-feel and features if possible. Ideally they would be identical > >sites, just one > >with and one without adverstising etc. > > > >I'm thinking something like donating a 9 year lease for the domain names? > >Jetspeed is not really an entity.. so I guess any agreement would have to > be > >with ASF? > > > >I figured I'd post this out on the list despite the threat that now > anyone > >could "rip-off" > >the idea. I don't see this as my ticket to retirement, but it would be > nice > >if I could > >pick up some additional $'s and help the js portal community at the same > >time. > > > >I'm posting this after seeing David's last post about the server offer to > >see > >what people's opinions are. I think if people find it not altogether > >offensive, then > >we'd be two big steps closer to having a portlet area for jetspeed 2. > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 12:04 PM > >To: Jetspeed Developers List > >Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Contributed portlets page > > > > > > > >On Saturday, July 26, 2003, at 07:49 AM, Jeremy Ford wrote: > > > > > I'm +1 to adding a page to the Jetspeed site with links to other > > > portlets. > > > This will at least let people know that there are other portlets out > > > there > > > other than the ones Jetspeed provides. > > > > > > I like the idea of Jetspeed being self hosted. While Apache may not > > > be the > > > host of a portlet catalog, perhaps Jetspeed could interact with one. > I > > > think it would be cool if you could browse a portlet catalog from a > > > installed Jetspeed and be able to dynamically install portlets from > it. > > > Just one of my dreams to go along with Mark's. :) > > > > > Jeremy Ford > > > > > > >Has anyone inquired to see if Apache allows for running application > >servers at their site? > >It seems kind of strange that they wouldn't support such a thing. > > > >If Apache wants no part of it, I'd be glad to donate a server to run it > >on. > > > >I think its worth asking Apache first. > >Just beware of the bureaucracy,.. > > > >-- > >David Sean Taylor > >Bluesunrise Software > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >+01 707 773-4646 > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
