El viernes, 24 octu, 2003, a las 23:34 Europe/Madrid, Mark Orciuch escribi�:


I will have the time to do the FINAL RELEASE next week (may need some help
with certain activities like setting up new milestone in Bugzilla).


I strongly feel that we should do the final release and not another Beta. I
understand that you have many new contributions but they can always be
included in 1.5. If we don't freeze the changes now, I guarantee that the
release will be delayed another 1-2 months. So my vote is +1 for the final
release.



+1


I prefer releasing and adding the new contributions in a separate branch for a future release or maintenance version

Best regards,

Mark Orciuch - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jakarta Jetspeed - Enterprise Portal in Java
http://jakarta.apache.org/jetspeed/

-----Original Message-----
From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Jetspeed Developers List
Subject: Re: [Vote] Jetspeed 1.4 Release



On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 10:31 AM, Jeremy Ford wrote:

In light of the new contributions, should we perhaps then tag the CVS
and produce a 1.4b5?  I would be fine with a 1.4b5.

Yes, Im fine with that.
I just want to point out that some one else is going to have to handle
doing the release, since I can't do it while Im out of the office
I'd be happy to cut the release when I return 3rd week of November
Otherwise, Mark has been through 2 release cycles and if he has time...


--
David Sean Taylor
Bluesunrise Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+01 707 773-4646
+01 707 529 9194


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to