Hi all, Yes, it actually does assume a 0-1 role per user in each group. It was implemented that way because that's the specifications of our project and initially we started this as an alternate security service. But the required changes to function properly (0 or more roles for each group) aren't much. We will work on it.
n > -----Original Message----- > From: Santiago Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:07 AM > To: Jetspeed Developers List > Subject: Re: FW: User - group - role philosophy -> our proposal > > > > El jueves, 11 dici, 2003, a las 15:46 Europe/Madrid, Vlachogiannis > Evangelos escribi�: > > > Hi all, > > > > Further ... > > The patch is based on yesterday CVS ver. > > You can check our proposal running at: > > http://epyna.syros.aegean.gr:8080/jetspeed . Feel free to > login using > > jetspeed defaults (admin/jetspeed) edit a user groups/roles and > > add/edit groups and roles. > > > > I had little time to look at it, but what strikes me is that > I expected > a user would have 0 or more roles in each group, and the user > interface > seems to assume 0-1 role per user in each group. > > It would be great to discuss cleanly the semantics and use > cases before > committing code (unless it is in an alternate and optional security > service). > > > > By the way, I would like to ask you a question. We have put > that to a > > slackware Linux and that's why you are going to see some > problems on > > jetspeed. Can anyone give an explanation pls? > > > > The problem I see is related with xalan, which should be put in the > endorsed dir, either in tomcat or in the jdk dir (1.4 related) > > Regards, > Santiago > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
