On Jul 1, 2004, at 11:02 AM, Scott T Weaver wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 12:07, David Sean Taylor wrote:Yup, you can do whatever you please, but it doesn't change the fact that you would have still broken the J1 build.On Jul 1, 2004, at 8:35 AM, Scott T Weaver wrote:
PortletWindowAccessor has 2 methods: createPortletWindow methods that
are never used anywhere, looks like the getWindow methods take care of
this for us automatically. I propose we delete these unused methods as
they can cause confusion on how the API is used.
-1 I think you need to do a CVS update now and then and be considerate ofI update every day. I don't use J1 so I don't have it in my environment, I guess that is on more thing I need to be concerned about.what other developers on the TEAM are doingThat is why I asked. I could have just deleted them.
In my mind, the Jetspeed-1 and Jetspeed-2 teams are the same.
There are two different CVS modules, yet we as committers are members of both CVS modules.
Once we have a release, any release of J2, then J1 will become dependent on it.
Until then, IMO we do have to be concerned about J1 making use of the J2 API.
So whenever the Jetspeed API changes, compile J1
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
