On simplified naming conventions in the Spring configs, I am -1 as well. I agree with Ate and Keith.
--- Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott T Weaver wrote: > > Yup, see bullet point 5 ;) > I'm not sure you two are talking about the same > thing here... > > Is bullet point 5) about the simplified naming > conventions in the Spring configs? > Or is Raphaël talking about the refactoring of our > packages we discussed several weeks ago? > > For the record: I've decided I'm -1 on the > simplified naming conventions in the Spring configs > as it kills the namespace benefit which also has > been pointed out by Keith Garry Boyce. > > Regards, > > Ate > > > > -Scott > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Raphaël Luta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:25 AM > >>To: Jetspeed Developers List > >>Subject: Re: New development branch > >> > >>+1. > >>We could also use this branch to test the > refactoring of package names you > >>proposed wome weeks ago. > >> > >>Scott T Weaver wrote: > >> > >>>As I was working on getting the engine unit tests > to work, I noticed > >> > >>there > >> > >>>are still many places were we still need to > refactor things into Spring > >> > >>or > >> > >>>make them better "citizens" so to speak. As to > avoid messing anyone up > >> > >>I am > >> > >>>going to create a new branch to commit these > changes into. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>Primary goals: > >>> > >>>1. Move as much into Spring as possible. > >>>2. Get the Engine and PortalContext into Spring > (actually have this > >>>working already) > >>>3. Remove as many calls to the > org.apache.jetspeed.Jetspeed static > >>>class as possible. > >>>4. Refactor those services that are using > class.newInstance() to use > >>>dependency injection. > >>>5. Implement my proposed shorter bean naming > convention (email from > >>>last week) > >>>6. Reduce the number of calls to the > ComponentManager; again this is > >>>solved by introducing dependency injection into > those classes that > >> > >>currently > >> > >>>do not use it. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>I just want to get everyone's feeling on this. > If everyone agrees I > >> > >>will > >> > >>>log this into Jira. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>Thanks, > >>> > >>>-Scott > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>Raphaël Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Apache Portals - Enterprise Portal in Java > >>http://portals.apache.org/ > >> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ________________________ David Le Strat Blogging @ http://dlsthoughts.blogspot.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
