[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JS2-257?page=all ]

Michael Lipp updated JS2-257:
-----------------------------

    Fix Version: 2.0-POST
    Description: 
I am trying to build an EAR that includes Jetspeed as a module (1). I have put 
the "shared libraries" as (client-)libraries in the EAR and the jetspeed.war as 
a web module. Looks quite promising so far. Of course, deployment of portlets 
doesn't work. As far as I have understood the architecture, the next step would 
be write a DeploymentManager that uses JSR77 to deploy the portlet modules in 
the application server. This should then be a "general" solution for any JSR77 
compliant application server.

Being new to Jetspeed, I' appreciate if someone could confirm that this is the 
way to go or tell me if this approach is wrong before I continue the effort.

Thanks

    Michael

(1) I often get the impression that the J2EE ecosystem suffers from mixing up 
components and containers. The installation instructions give me the impression 
that -- although Jetspeed is a web component -- is has partially be conceived 
as an extension of the application server. In order to really call it "J2EE 
compliant", I feel it must be possible to bundle Jetspeed into an EAR in order 
to be able to deliver a complete (enterprise) application to the customer in 
that format.


  was:
I am trying to build an EAR that includes Jetspeed as a module (1). I have put 
the "shared libraries" as (client-)libraries in the EAR and the jetspeed.war as 
a web module. Looks quite promising so far. Of course, deployment of portlets 
doesn't work. As far as I have understood the architecture, the next step would 
be write a DeploymentManager that uses JSR77 to deploy the portlet modules in 
the application server. This should then be a "general" solution for any JSR77 
compliant application server.

Being new to Jetspeed, I' appreciate if someone could confirm that this is the 
way to go or tell me if this approach is wrong before I continue the effort.

Thanks

    Michael

(1) I often get the impression that the J2EE ecosystem suffers from mixing up 
components and containers. The installation instructions give me the impression 
that -- although Jetspeed is a web component -- is has partially be conceived 
as an extension of the application server. In order to really call it "J2EE 
compliant", I feel it must be possible to bundle Jetspeed into an EAR in order 
to be able to deliver a complete (enterprise) application to the customer in 
that format.


        Version: 2.0-POST

> Deployment using JSR77
> ----------------------
>
>          Key: JS2-257
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JS2-257
>      Project: Jetspeed 2
>         Type: New Feature
>   Components: Deployment
>     Versions: 2.0-POST
>  Environment: Any
>     Reporter: Michael Lipp
>      Fix For: 2.0-POST

>
> I am trying to build an EAR that includes Jetspeed as a module (1). I have 
> put the "shared libraries" as (client-)libraries in the EAR and the 
> jetspeed.war as a web module. Looks quite promising so far. Of course, 
> deployment of portlets doesn't work. As far as I have understood the 
> architecture, the next step would be write a DeploymentManager that uses 
> JSR77 to deploy the portlet modules in the application server. This should 
> then be a "general" solution for any JSR77 compliant application server.
> Being new to Jetspeed, I' appreciate if someone could confirm that this is 
> the way to go or tell me if this approach is wrong before I continue the 
> effort.
> Thanks
>     Michael
> (1) I often get the impression that the J2EE ecosystem suffers from mixing up 
> components and containers. The installation instructions give me the 
> impression that -- although Jetspeed is a web component -- is has partially 
> be conceived as an extension of the application server. In order to really 
> call it "J2EE compliant", I feel it must be possible to bundle Jetspeed into 
> an EAR in order to be able to deliver a complete (enterprise) application to 
> the customer in that format.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to