I also just upgraded from a nightly build to 3.0, and only encountered one minor stinker. Widgets with the name *Pane (TabPane, LayoutPane, etc) have been globally renamed to *Container. Just an FYI ;)
Regards, -Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 1:01 PM > To: Jetspeed Developers List > Subject: Re: Jetspeed and dojo > > Hi Steve, > thanks for the info. That is very helpful. > > I suppose if jetspeed is used in its "default" form (ie. not jetspeed > desktop), then dojo.js is not used at all, correct? (Excuse my > ignorance, I haven't really checked out jetspeed desktop yet). > > > > On 5/22/06, Steve Milek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At this time, jetspeed-desktop is using a nightly source build of dojo > from > > 2006-04-21. We plan to replace the 04-21 edition with the official dojo > 0.3 > > release (from 2006-05-15). Jetspeed-desktop should not be adversely > affected > > by use of a later dojo version (later meaning anything after what is > > currently checked-in: dojo nightly build 2006-04-21). > > > > We use dojo source builds because we're still developing jetspeed- > desktop. > > Replacing the source build with one of the compressed editions should > not > > cause problems (so long as the particular compressed edition does not > > exclude dojo components needed by jetspeed-desktop - and of course it > must > > be 2006-04-21 or later). > > > > When deploying jetspeed, dojo is expanded from this zip file: > > src/javascript/dojo/dojo.zip > > to: > > <portal-webapp-context>/javascript/dojo/ > > > > Also, it is not possible for two versions of dojo to exist in the same > > webpage. In fact, it is disastrous. > > > > I hope this helps. > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Aaron Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 7:55 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Jetspeed and dojo > > > > > > Hey guys, > > I know that dojo has been baked into jetspeed post release 2.0 to > > support the desktop features and that is great. > > > > I have been working against 2.0 for a while now and am looking forward > > to upgrading to 2.1. However, in the mean time, I've been using > > elements of dojo within my portlets. > > > > So I'm wondering what the impact will be when I upgrade. Assuming we > > are using different versions and builds, is it even possible to have > > an aggregated portal page that combines two different "dojo runtimes" > > (for lack of a better term)? > > > > Can you give me some details as to what version is being used? Are > > you doing a dojo "build" (ie. creating a slimmed down build of just > > the required elements)? And if so, has that been put into the > > jetspeed build process so that one can incorporate their own dojo > > packages? > > > > thx in advance, > > aaron > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
