Sounds good to me I would love to get back in the game as it were :) One of DOJO's biggest downfalls was their attempt to "rewrite" how javascript works and trying to make it more "java-like". This just compounds the complexity exponentially when coupled with the fact that the documentation is so sparse.
-scott > -----Original Message----- > From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 9:55 AM > To: Jetspeed Developers List > Subject: Re: Modifying the Jetspeed Desktop > > > On Apr 23, 2007, at 3:46 PM, Weaver, Scott wrote: > > > Hi Team, > > > > I am just curious. Which, if any, javascript API, are you thinking of > > replacing DOJO with? I was using DOJO for my "desktop" implementation > > but dropped it about 5 months ago because issues with size, relative > > complexity, the dearth of documentation and performance issues > > (specifically with widgets). I did a little research and decided > > to go > > with jQuery, which I immediately fell in love with. Compressed, the > > base jQuery is only 19k. > > > I hear you about the documentation, man I do suffer there .... > > Maybe we need to have a Jetspeed Summit meeting to discuss all these > new directions. like jQuery > I think it would be great to get you and Steve and Team and the > other /desktop developers together to brainstorm .... > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
