On Apr 23, 2007, at 8:41 PM, Santiago Gala wrote:
El lun, 23-04-2007 a las 11:27 -0400, Weaver, Scott escribió:
(...)
I actually wanted to write javascript, well at least writing it the
jQuery way ;-). jQuery uses XPath for traversing the DOM and is quite
quick at it.
Why not JSON ( www.json.org ) ? it is way simpler to handle, plus it
does not require well-formed XML. Well-formedness was my killer in our
first attempt at client-side aggregation.
JSON is generated and parsed very easily, in java, ruby, python, perl,
and, of course, javascript.
A number of the Jetspeed APIs are already available in JSON or XML
since 2.1
