Don't use netscape 4x, it won't work ... Jetspeed have problem with table
rendering in Netscape...

I tested in N6 and IE5, work well...

Frans
----- Original Message -----
From: "ICM S Op Guest 5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:05 PM
Subject: RE: Performance of latest release of Jetspeed-1.3a2


> Hi,
>
> I can confirm your observation.
>
> Netscape is very slow! But sometimes it's even slow on a IE.
> But I understand that it takes some time to gather all those
informations - think of contacting 5 different url's simultaneously to get
their content! For software projects like jetspeed I would say the most
important part is a clever caching mechanism! Maybe we can do some
improvements on it...
>
> Andreas Kempf
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christoph Steinbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2001 16:19
> > To: Jetspeed Users List
> > Subject: Re: Performance of latest release of Jetspeed-1.3a2
> >
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > thanks for the quick answer. And you solved the mystery. The
> > problem is
> > Netscape 4.7x. D**n!
> > Internet Explorer and Mozilla show the pages instantaneously.
> > The effect is dramatic. 15 sec for showing the entry sceen on Netscape
> > 4.78.. The logo and everything above the thin line (login form, etc.)
> > was there immediately but the rest of the portlets (jetspeed, apache
> > jetspeed, welcome) takes those 15 sec to appear.
> >
> > I don't want any "This page is worst viewed with NS 4.7x" logos on my
> > site. :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Christoph Steinbeck (http://www.ice.mpg.de/departments/ChemInf)
> > MPI of Chemical Ecology, Winzerlaer Str. 10, Beutenberg Campus, 07745
> > Jena, Germany
> > Tel: +49(0)3641 571263 - Fax: +49(0)3641 571202
> >
> > What is man but that lofty spirit - that sense of enterprise.
> > ... Kirk, "I, Mudd," stardate 4513.3..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Paul Spencer wrote:
> > >
> > > Chris,
> > > As you pointed out, performance is based in many factors.
> > The retrieval
> > > portlet content is one.  Another is related to how fast the
> > browser can
> > > render the returned page.  Netscape 4.7x has a known
> > performance problem
> > > with nested tables.  Jetspeed uses nested tables :(
> > >
> > > 10 second is a long time to display the Jetspeed home page.
> >  I am not
> > > seeing this.  Most of the time Jetspeed's home page is
> > displayed in <1
> > > second.  By the way, thank you for quantifying "slow performance" !!
> > >
> > > Places to look:
> > > o Log files!  Including Jetspeed's, Tomcat's, and the web server's.
> > > o General performance on the server machine(s), i.e. if server is
> > >    low on memory it will spend a lot of time swapping pages instead
> > >    of running applications.
> > > o Load and configuration on the client machine, i.e. is the client
> > >    a 100 MHz PII with 16 MB of memory?
> > > o Proxies, the lurk on corporate networks and can cause caching and
> > >    performance problems :(
> > > o Firewalls can prevent prevent content retrieval and cause jetspeed
> > >    to wait for the request to time-out.
> > > o General network performance
> > >
> > > Paul Spencer
> > >
> > > Christoph Steinbeck wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everybody,
> > > >
> > > > I must say that this latest release of Jetspeed-1.3a2 is a great
> > > > achievement. I was able to run and configure it (including email
> > > > confirmation, etc.) within a few minutes.
> > > > Now, since we are planning to use this for a scientific database
> > > > front-end, I was wondering whether the relatively slow
> > response times
> > > > that I get here, are
> > > >
> > > > - due to a problem on my side, or
> > > > - a known problem, or
> > > > - a feature, not a bug :-)
> > > >
> > > > and whether one can do anything about it.
> > > >
> > > > I understand that if you have all these news feed
> > portlets switched on,
> > > > the response can be slowed down due to non reachable
> > sites somewhere
> > > > else.
> > > > Indeed, when I switched off all these feed-portlets, I
> > could reduce the
> > > > time for a page to appear from several minutes to less
> > then ten seconds.
> > > > But of course, that's still too slow. Are there some
> > caching features,
> > > > that need to switched on, or anything else I can do about it?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Dr. Christoph Steinbeck
> > (http://www.ice.mpg.de/departments/ChemInf)
> > > > MPI of Chemical Ecology, Winzerlaer Str. 10, Beutenberg
> > Campus, 07745
> > > > Jena, Germany
> > > > Tel: +49(0)3641 571263 - Fax: +49(0)3641 571202
> > > >
> > > > What is man but that lofty spirit - that sense of enterprise.
> > > > ... Kirk, "I, Mudd," stardate 4513.3..
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to