It would be nice if the person that is involved in the JSR process released a short story on Slashdot: "How to spend your whole life in a JCP commitee" :-)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Luta, Raphael (VUN) [mailto:Raphael.Luta@;groupvu.Com] > Sent: dimanche 27 octobre 2002 21:10 > To: 'Jetspeed Users List' > Subject: RE: JSR 162 > > > JSR 162 was the initial proposal from IBM. > JSR 167 was the counter-proposal from Sun > JSR 168 is the merger of the 2 above after they realised they both > looked really stupid by having 2 independant specification > committees ;> > > So only JSR 168 is actually active and was supposed to initially have > a public draft in September. > Don't you love these never-ending committees ? > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Sandra Cann [mailto:flying_cloud@;prodigy.net] > Envoy� : dimanche 27 octobre 2002 17:33 > � : 'Jetspeed Users List' > Objet : RE: JSR 162 > > > Well that is confusing - the JCP.org also has another JSR 167 and 168 > with a description of Portlet Specification. Since the page is viewed > with JSRs in sequential order these might be missed when someone finds > the first record. Might be an idea to have the two withdrawn jsrs > removed from the page or at least reference the new jsr? > > Anyway 168 also listed as Portlet Specification is not withdrawn. :) > > Portlet API Spec community draft: 10/2002 > Portlet API Spec public draft: 12/2002 > > Any chance since it is 10/2002 we could get a little update > on progress > to how it is progressing? > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:jetspeed-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:jetspeed-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:jetspeed-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
