On Wed, 22 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > yes it will. turbine WILL create the log file...i checked in those fixes a
> > > while ago...if you don't want the log file, you don't define the property.
> >
> > Cool! +1. I didnt' see this commit!
>
> sorry, bad cvs commit message on my part...
>
>
><http://www.working-dogs.com/turbine/cvsweb/index.cgi/turbine/src/java/org/apache/turbine/util/Log.java.diff?r1=1.4&r2=1.5&only_with_tag=MAIN>
>
> i love how you removed the rest of my message though...;-) have you taken
> a close look at JDO yet? i dare you to implement something with it...;-)
^^^^
I might just have to take you up on that. My big concern is mapping the
objects. The more complex the object, the more problems I think you will
run into mapping them back to the database. I seem to remember someone (I
believe it may have been a Castor programmer) saying that mapping needed
more work in Castor before it could handle complex business objects.
As far as Castor not being done, the more people who use the open
source products at an early stage the faster the products develop.
Later
Jeff Prickett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
