jon * wrote:
>
> on 3/23/00 7:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I might just have to take you up on that. My big concern is mapping the
> > objects. The more complex the object, the more problems I think you will
> > run into mapping them back to the database. I seem to remember someone (I
> > believe it may have been a Castor programmer) saying that mapping needed
> > more work in Castor before it could handle complex business objects.
> >
> > As far as Castor not being done, the more people who use the open
> > source products at an early stage the faster the products develop.
>
> right, but Peer's in Turbine are a LOT further along (and tested and
> debugged and easier to use and and and and and and)...
<snip>
We will see. The castor project has some things that turbine lacks and
vice versa. It has been in the back of my mind that these two projects
should be the same code base some day... just haven't had time to hack
on the problem.
Kevin
--
Kevin A Burton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://relativity.yi.org
Message to SUN: "Please Open Source Java!"
"For evil to win is for good men to do nothing."
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
