[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 May 2000, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
<snip>
> Make sense. Seems a little contradictory, but I hope you know what I mean.
>
> > Also, should iCalendar be a Portlet or an Application? Hmmm?
>
> Right now its going to consist of a couple of turbine screens, so its more
> separate from a portlet.
>
> I would, however, like to see it become a Portlet in future versions
ohohh -1. Is there a reason it should be a Turbine screen? If you are
writing a Turbine screen it is just as easy to write a Portlet.
Honestly using Portlets is the only way I can see this being
integrated. There is just so much we can do with Portlets (that have
application=true). I mean we can give the user a list of the
applications that are installed, use the standard navigations easily,
etc.
Kevin
--
Kevin A Burton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://relativity.yi.org
Message to SUN: "Please Open Source Java!"
"For evil to win is for good men to do nothing."
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
