I agree that a "editable" field should be in the xml. for instance the
sample "search" psml that looks like this:
<entry type="ref" parent="FileServer" name="Search">
would change to:
<entry type="ref" parent="FileServer" name="Search" editable="true">
or
<entry type="ref" parent="FileServer" name="Search" editable="false">
burtonator wrote:
>
> Rapha�l Luta wrote:
> >
> > burtonator wrote:
> > >
> > > Mukul Paithane wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I like the idea for edit. I am not sure I understand the purpose of logging
> > > > in for being able to maximize ...
> > >
> > > Yes. I agree. I will put this code into CVS for getAllowEdit into
> > > AbstractPortlet.
> > >
> >
> > I disagree. This should be implemented in the PortletControl.
>
> I see your point. But a Portlet should be able to specify that it
> cannot be edited. The Control will just provide the UI for this.
>
> I really want to take the logic out of the Portlet interface and put
> this into PSML. This would remove both arguments.
>
> Kevin
>
> --
> Kevin A Burton (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], UIN: 73488596, ZKey:
> burtonator)
> http://relativity.yi.org
> Message to SUN: "Please Open Source Java!"
> To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence;
> supreme
> excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
> - Sun Tzu, 300 B.C.
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
