Mike Mondragon wrote:
>
> I agree that a "editable" field should be in the xml. for instance the
> sample "search" psml that looks like this:
>
> <entry type="ref" parent="FileServer" name="Search">
>
> would change to:
>
> <entry type="ref" parent="FileServer" name="Search" editable="true">
> or
> <entry type="ref" parent="FileServer" name="Search" editable="false">
It wil probably become:
<property name="jetspeed.core.portlet-editable" value="false"/>
I don't think we should keep revising the XML document if it doesn't
need it. Granted the above would work as PSML with a small fix.
Kevin
--
Kevin A Burton (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], UIN: 73488596, ZKey:
burtonator)
http://relativity.yi.org
Message to SUN: "Please Open Source Java!"
To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence;
supreme
excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
- Sun Tzu, 300 B.C.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
