Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 7/24/2000 5:45 PM, "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> at least part of these components (the DB connection pool) was
> >> "" to Cocoon, is: why don't we make these useful components
> >> available at a lower level, so that they can be used by Turbine
> >> and Cocoon (and others)? (Not that I'm volunteering right now... 8-) >
> >
> > I believe the Avalon project would be a good place to put these components.
>
> Actually, they are just fine where they are at. There is no need to change
> what isn't broken just to fit it into some model.
Avalon is a good place to put interfaces.. and possibly a bridge. It
only really becomes useful if the component is used across > 2 projects.
> I just don't understand people who think EJB's are the best solution when
> simply using a Singleton will do the job just fine. It is the square peg
> round hole problem.
Sledge hammer :)
--
Kevin A Burton (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], UIN: 73488596, ZKey:
burtonator)
http://relativity.yi.org
Message to SUN: "Please Open Source Java!"
To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence;
supreme
excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
- Sun Tzu, 300 B.C.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
