I am going to implement this... I am fairly sure that no one will -1 me
:)
In order to keep things consistent... and to avoid class naming
collisions. I decided that in <psml> we should have
<portlet-entry-ref name="BASE_PORTLET"/>
instead of the current <portlet-entry ref="BASE_PORTLET"/>
This keeps things consistent and obvious... and it also avoids duplicate
peer classes. IE org.apache.jetspeed.registry.peer.PortletEntry and
org.apache.jetspeed.psml.peer.PortletEntryRef do not collide :)
This should keep things more obvious.
Kevin
--
** Should SUN Open Source Java? Please Vote:
http://relativity.yi.org/java **
Kevin A Burton (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], UIN: 73488596, ZKey:
burtonator)
http://relativity.yi.org | http://www.openprivacy.org
Message to SUN Microsystems: "Please Open Source Java!"
To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence;
supreme
excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
- Sun Tzu, 300 B.C.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
